IconImage
Alerts
May 13, 2011

USPTO not immune from budget cuts

Implementation of Track One expedited examination postponed
The Federal Government enacted its fiscal year 2011 budget on April 15, 2011. This budget contains the USPTO’s appropriation through the end of the Federal fiscal year, which is September 30, 2011. With the enactment of this budget, the total spending authority for the USPTO has been limited to $2.09 billion, which is down approximately $100 million from the USPTO’s initial fiscal year 2011 budget.

This budget deficit is now causing the USPTO to make some significant reductions from its previously planned activities. Specifically, the USPTO is immediately enacting the following:

  • Track One, which offers expedited patent examination and was scheduled to go into effect on May 4, 2011, is postponed
  • The opening of the planned satellite office in Detroit, as well as consideration of other possible satellite office locations, is postponed
  • Hiring for new positions and backfills is frozen
  • IT projects will be scaled back
  • Funding for Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) outsourcing will be substantially reduced
  • Employee training will be reduced
  • All overtime is suspended

Unfortunately, one result of these cuts is that pendency of applications before the USPTO will likely increase. Given that the USPTO is already short of qualified examiners, the prohibitions on hiring additional examiners and allowing current examiners to work overtime, will overburden the current examiners. It is likely that the examiners will fall further behind in their examination of pending applications.

The progress that the USPTO has made in reducing pendency of applications will be for naught and will likely revert back to the longer pendency times. It is, therefore, more important to promptly file your applications and to promptly respond to all office actions in an effort to help reduce the pendency of your applications.

The budget cuts, however, have not impacted the other expedited prosecution programs previously available from the USPTO. Specifically, the following expedited examination programs are still available:

  • Accelerated Examination Program
  • Petitions to make special procedures for age or health
  • The Patent Prosecution Highway

For questions about how the USPTO budget cuts may impact you and your business, please contact:

Todd A. Benni

561.847.2349

tbenni@mcdonaldhopkins.com

David B. Cupar

216.430.2036

dcupar@mcdonaldhopkins.com

David T. Movius

216.430.2029

dmovius@mcdonaldhopkins.com

or any of the intellectual property attorneys at McDonald Hopkins by clicking on the intellectual property link below:

Intellectual Property

It is critical in today's technology-driven, global marketplace to effectively procure and manage intellectual property. Our clients rely on us to provide prompt, thorough and efficient counsel on matters involving patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade dress, trade secrets, intellectual property procurement, and enforcement. We focus on management and enforcement for Fortune 500 companies, mid-cap companies and start-ups. Supported by the talents of our litigation and business law attorneys, our IP attorneys deliver a complete range of innovative and comprehensive solutions, as well as insightful industry expertise. Our in-depth approach enables us to meet the business goals of our diverse client base. In fact, the hallmark of our IP practice is to dovetail our clients’ intellectual property needs with their business plans and strategies, presenting a cohesive and thorough outcome.

Carl J. Grassi, President
600 Superior Avenue, East, Suite 2100, Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Chicago
312.280.0111
Fax: 312.280.8232
Cleveland
216.348.5400
Fax: 216.348.5474
Columbus
614.458.0025
Fax: 614.458.0028
Detroit
248.646.5070
Fax: 248.646.5075
Miami
305.704.3990
Fax: 305.704.3999
West Palm Beach
561.472.2121
Fax: 561.472.2122
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) avoiding any penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction matter addressed herein.