Fourth Amendment Does Not Block Government From Finding Out Where Your Cell Phone Has Been

Blog Post

The full United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled yesterday that the constitution does not require a search warrant or probable cause to justify the Government obtaining historical cell site information.

In United States v. Quartavius Davis, the Government got a court order for 67 days of cell site data – records of where the defendant's cell phone had been at various times. Those records showed that the phone was present at the locations where 6 different armed robberies occurred. The Government obtained these records under the Stored Communications Act (SCA), which authorizes a court to order cell service providers to release records upon a showing that there is "reasonable grounds to believe" the evidence is "relevant and material" to a criminal investigation. The SCA does not require a showing of probable cause.

In a 9-2 decision, the Court held that the SCA did not violate the fourth amendment and affirmed Davis' conviction.

Several judges wrote separate opinions, which are particularly interesting to read. They address the growing issue of how to conform traditional fourth amendment search and seizure law to emerging technologies. Both Courts and Congress will be grappling with this issue in the years ahead.

Data Privacy

Jump to Page

McDonald Hopkins uses cookies on our website to enhance user experience and analyze website traffic. Third parties may also use cookies in connection with our website for social media, advertising and analytics and other purposes. By continuing to browse our website, you agree to our use of cookies as detailed in our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.